Re: path PATH

[Roman Perepelitsa <roman.perepelitsa@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 5:25 PM Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 8:10 AM Roman Perepelitsa
> <roman.perepelitsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > These are not "real" values. You can choose any representation you
> > like. It looks like you want this:
> >
> >     printf '[%s]=%s ' "${(@kvq+)bg}"
>
> Actually he just wants
>
>   typeset -m bg
>
> which is what describe-params does, so I don't know how we got off
> into these weeds again.

Good point.

Mine still stands though. Ray, if you don't like how `typeset -m`
represents information, you can always produce your own hand-crafted
output. If you don't know how, ask.

Roman.